[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bts ldap interface: future developments ...

hi andreas,

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 05:14:50PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> For that reason, I consider to drop the old entries from the main file, 
> and stick them to a text file so that searches in the archived bugs take
> even longer than today, but all others would be really fast. The problem
> with that is of course that bugs change their DN on archiving.

i'm not convinced that changing the DN's for archived bugs is necessarily
a bad thing (i know it usually is frowned upon) though if that were to
happen, couldn't it be offloaded into a different base DN but still kept
within the gateway?

for example, say you have


adding a


and then changing the dn of bugs to point there would keep them out
of the main bugs bucket, which would get the speed boost for people
properly doing scope=one searches, and people who wanted to search
everything could do a scope=sub on the base dn.

> Opinions, further suggestions?

- what are you currently doing wrt indexing?
- what underlying db format are you using?



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: