On Monday 16 May 2005 23.27, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 16, Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> wrote: > > I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels > > up to 2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so > > theoretically people could still be using it with current kernels. > > Wait until sarge has been released and then kill it. Is it orphaned? If not, why kill it? Some people have invested many hours writing their firewall scripts, and if they can continue to use them they're happy. (Not me - ipfwadm hasn't done enough for my taste in a long time.) cheers -- vbi -- Kallisti!
Attachment:
pgpb2gN79cI4k.pgp
Description: PGP signature