[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

gwrapguile: Question about suitability of changes for sarge

[Resent message, first one seemingly didn't get thru]


I prepared an upload for gwrapguile and fix #308499. The changelog
looks like this:

  * Move /usr/bin/g-wrap-config to libgwrapguile-dev (closes: #308499).
  * Include manpage for g-wrap-config.
  * Make libgwrapguile-dev depend on guile, since g-wrap-config is a
    guile script.
  * g-wrap.m4: Fix underquoted definitions (closes: #274478).
  * Build-Depend on debhelper (>> 4).
  * Bump policy version to 3.6.1 (no changes).
  * Fix malformed jgoerzen email address in changelog.

These are all changes that have little or no impact (besides the one
fixing #308499), but fix packaging issues. So my question is: would
the above be suitable to go into sarge, or should I prepare an upload
that just fixes #308499?

Thanks, Rotty
Andreas Rottmann         | Rotty@ICQ      | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at
http://yi.org/rotty      | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
v2sw7MYChw5pr5OFma7u7Lw2m5g/l7Di6e6t5BSb7en6g3/5HZa2Xs6MSr1/2p7 hackerkey.com

Python is executable pseudocode, Perl is executable line-noise.

Reply to: