[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RC bug #308477 and MIA maintainer (?)

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:59:07AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:59:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > severity 308477 important
> > thanks

> > You are correct that it is a policy violation.  However, not all policy
> > violations are release-critical for a given release; see

> Maybe I will sound procedural or something, but I would really prefer
> if such policy violation bug were severity serious with a sarge-ignore
> tag. It is important to keep track of policy violation bug that affect
> sid, and it will be hard to remember all bugs that should have their
> severity raised once sarge is released.

As it's been explained to me by the BTS folks, use of sarge-ignore implies
that the bug will become RC for etch immediately after sarge's release.  For
this bug, I don't see any reason to think that's the case.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: