[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: packages missing from sarge

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:17:41AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:32:49AM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 02:40 schrieb Anthony DeRobertis:
> > > Seconded! The only RC-bug in openswan is for a newer version of the
> > > kernel which will not ship with Sarge.
> > Yes, that's true. I have to admit that I messed up in not marking this bug 
> > sid. My current best solution would be to put 2.2.0-4 back into testing 
> > (which got removed because of that RC bug that's for 2.3.0). What is the 
> > general opinion on this?

> If that 2.3.x bug really only affects the newer (> 2.6.8) kernel, why
> not just get 2.3.x pushed into sarge? Are there any other big issues
> with it, that weren't in 2.2.x? Some people might certainly like the
> agressive mode support, or 2.3.1's NAT-T fixes. Personally, 2.2.x is
> fine for me though --- anything but 2.1.x for me :-)

Because 2.2.3 is no longer in the archive, and resurrecting new binaries via
t-p-u gives us even less than the usual protection against breakage caused
by a lack of testing. :/

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: