Re: debian sarge is 3.2 or 4 ?
>>>>> "Bartosz" == Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <email@example.com> writes:
> I would prefer to be maintainer of the well known distribution which
> *doesn't* bump versions only for the fun of it.
Exactly. This time I think it would have been justified. Consider
* A new installer
* Linux Kernel 2.6
* Gnome 2.8
* KDE 3.3
* glibc 2.3.2
* Several new architectures
4.0 would be justified.
> I know that for most people numbers have some magic meaning, but please can
> we try to provide stable OS by its quality and not version number?
> Calling sarge 4.0 won't make it better.
It won't, but it would (rightly) indicate that it's a major upgrade from 3.1.
Ganesan Rajagopal (rganesan at debian.org) | GPG Key: 1024D/5D8C12EA
Web: http://employees.org/~rganesan | http://rganesan.blogspot.com