Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed
On Apr 1, 2005 7:32 AM, Andrew Suffield <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:24:23PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Andrew Suffield
> > | It's a method of working around bugs. Just fix the bugs
> > | instead. Update libtool to the latest version and don't -l stuff you
> > | don't need to -l.
> > pkgconfig does add a bunch of gratious -l, similar to what libtool
> > used to. This will be fixed, but I'm not sure I want to introduce
> > that so late in the release cycle.
> I'm pretty sure we don't want to go meddling with this stuff at all so
> late in the release cycle, so everything here is post-sarge.
I agree, but are we tracking all these post-sarge issues that are coming on d-d
and others lists? I hope that after sarge we start working on these
etch came closer.
I'm interested in put online a web page containing some things suggested to be
investigated post-sarge (technical stuff only), anyone too?
Gustavo Franco -- <email@example.com>