On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 15:49 +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Thursday 31 March 2005 15:14, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > * Steve Kowalik > > > > | On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:54:01 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen uttered > > | > > | > TTBOMK, he hasn't discussed this with the dpkg maintainer, nor has he > > | > made his code public. > > | > > | Er, Adam Heath has made plenty of uploads of dpkg, and is listed as an > > | Uploader. > > > > Yes, but (again, TTBOMK) he still hasn't discussed it with Scott James > > Remnant who is the one doing most of the dpkg development those days. > > He doesn't seem to have an arch repository listed on > > http://www.dpkg.org/ArchMirrors either. > > I found a brief page for discussions about the new source format [1], when a > new target is proposed (unpack) which should unpack the tarfiles and apply > the patches. > Yeah, that was my musings on the subject -- nothing to do with Adam. > Also what happend to the dpkg repo at cvs.debian.org. I've got this for a week > or so. > Converted to Arch -- http://www.dpkg.org/ArchRepository Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part