Policy for devfs support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Is there a project-wide policy for support for devfs (and devfs-style,
e.g. udev devfs.rules) device naming?
I'm asking because of obstruction (from upstream) regarding the
application of a simple patch to allow yaboot to support it:
If there was a definite policy of supporting it (or not), this would
be easier. As it stands, the tool is not properly functional on devfs
systems. Since we should aim to support a well-integrated system, I'm
not happy that folks can deliberately obstruct furthering the
integration of the system.
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----