Re: *seconded* Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
n Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:44:15AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:06:19PM +0000, Rob Taylor wrote:
> > Yes, that makes total sense. Would there likely be major objections to
> > this?
> Even less (likely zero) testing of packages by the maintainer before they
> upload? This is definitely a serious problem...
The binary deb that comes with the source only ensures that the package
is buildable on at least one arch. So don't allow for source only
uploads, rebuild on the uploaded arch and discard the uploaded binary.
> Famous last words...
> "Oh, I'll just make this one change, rebuild source and upload."
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org