Re: Possible compromise on releasing architectures
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:12:35AM +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:59:19AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > Release candidate architecture:
> >
> > * testing managed by port release manager(s)
> > * testing consists of packages that built on the candidate and
> > are in release architecture testing with the same version
>
> Please specify what applies to sources and what to binaries. As I
> understand your proposal, one would need architecture specific source
> repositories (as different architectures may have different versions
> in testing).
My proposale included "same version". Testing will have the same
version if any on all architectures. Testing may be broken by missing
packages on the candidate.
--
Blars Blarson blarson@blars.org
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
Reply to: