Re: How to define a release architecture
* Wouter Verhelst (wouter@grep.be) [050322 13:35]:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:28:18PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Wouter Verhelst (wouter@debian.org) [050322 13:05]:
> > > In the general case, as I have said before, I don't think anyone would
> > > take offense at a security announcement being sent out containing
> > > MD5sums for packages for i386, sparc, powerpc, alpha, ia64 and s390,
> > > with a message like 'packages for m68k, mips, mipsel, arm, and hppa will
> > > be announced when ready' if the delay would become unacceptable, or so.
> >
> > I have heared that the current scripts used on security.debian.org do
> > not really support this.
> Implementing whatever will come out of this will require some extra
> coding anyway; it won't hurt to have to add the security.d.o scripts to
> the list of 'things that need changes'. Sorry, but that's not a valid
> argument.
It was not meant as "we can't do it", but as "we need to put time into
that if we decide to do it".
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: