Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
Hi Matthew,
> I didn't realise how emotionally attached I was until I came to write
> this mail. I really wish things could have worked out better.
Although I am quite puzzled by the way you treated Sven a couple of
hours ago, I must say that it'd be sad to see you resign.
We've already lost too many DDs for no reason, and the Vancouver
proposal will probably lead to the loss of another batch of DDs.
But, it hasn't come into effect yet, and it's not sure it ever
will. As for the SC, it can still be reverted to the old wording;
that'll take a GR, of course.
Leaving because the Project goes in a direction that's against your
ideas (and against the Project's own ideas and values, fwiw) just
doesn't help. Adrian Bunk can tell you about that (Adrian, you should
really come back, btw). Fighting for your ideas would be the right
thing to do, here and now.
JB.
- --
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jblache@debian.org>
Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169
GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFCPycbzWFP1/XWUWkRAh8LAJ4mkyXj3Ux5hp8aex2Lae+6AxNXMACeNOfn
Hn/99k0Lx5cRQIJ9NgYTyUA=
=J+oP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: