Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus

[Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> wrote:

> I tend to agree that the veto rights in the proposal are undemocratic.
> It is probably better to allow the DPL to veto the inclusion, and
> document that he is required to ask the porters, the ftp masters and
> the release team before making up his mind.  This way the decition is
> taken by an elected person, based on the available input from the
> relevant teams.

Constitutionally, I think it makes more sense to devolve it to the
technical committee.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.vote@srcf.ucam.org