Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 02:57:23AM +0100, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> > > * Three bodies (Security, System Administration, Release) are given
> > >   independent veto power over the inclusion of an architecture.
> > >   A) Does the entire team have to exercise this veto for it to be
> > >      effective, or can one member of any team exercise this power
> > >      effectively?
> > 
> > It's expected that each team would exercise that veto as a *team*, by
> > reaching a consensus internally.
> 
> This is obviously unacceptable. Why would a small number of people be
> allowed to veto inclusion of other people's work ?

And a non-elected, non-properly-delegated, self-apointed group of people at
that.

Friendly,

Sven Luther