On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 09:54 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Ola Lundqvist dijo [Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 09:18:33PM +0100]: > > Hello > > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:45:47PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 00:53 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > I have several reports saying procmail does not support mbox folders > > > > larger than 2GB. Questions: > > > > > > OT here, but WTF are people smoking, to have 2GB mbox files? > > > > Some people tend to have really large inboxes. I have had a number of > > customers that have several GB inbox. They tend to get quite a lot > > of attachments (reports etc) and do not have the time to delete mail. > > It will grow quite fast. > > Ummm... And wouldn't it make more sense for them to switch to maildir > instead of mbox? I wouldn't like to search for new mails in there. But, but, but, we *love* using 6GB mbox files !!!!! -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "No drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of society. If we're looking for the sources of our troubles, we shouldn't test people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed and love of power." P. J. O'Rourke
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part