[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications

I demand that Aurelien Jarno may or may not have written...

> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:58:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > As Steve wrote
>> | - the release architecture must have N+1 buildds where N is the number
>> |   required to keep up with the volume of uploaded packages
>> The reason for this proposal should be instantly clear to everyone who
>> ever suffered from buildd backlogs. :)

> Which means a lot more buildd. [...]

Or, possibly, faster buildds. Take arm, for example: I had a quick look
yesterday at buildd.d.o to see what hardware was in use - all SA110. "All"
that it needs is somebody with an Iyonix <URL:http://www.iyonix.com/> or some
other XScale-based machine to step forward...

| Darren Salt   | nr. Ashington, | linux (or ds) at
| woody, sarge, | Northumberland | youmustbejoking
| RISC OS       | Toon Army      | demon co uk
|   Retrocomputing: a PC card in a Risc PC

BNFL: Buy No Fish Locally

Reply to: