Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications
I demand that Aurelien Jarno may or may not have written...
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:58:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > As Steve wrote
>> | - the release architecture must have N+1 buildds where N is the number
>> | required to keep up with the volume of uploaded packages
>> The reason for this proposal should be instantly clear to everyone who
>> ever suffered from buildd backlogs. :)
> Which means a lot more buildd. [...]
Or, possibly, faster buildds. Take arm, for example: I had a quick look
yesterday at buildd.d.o to see what hardware was in use - all SA110. "All"
that it needs is somebody with an Iyonix <URL:http://www.iyonix.com/> or some
other XScale-based machine to step forward...
| Darren Salt | nr. Ashington, | linux (or ds) at
| woody, sarge, | Northumberland | youmustbejoking
| RISC OS | Toon Army | demon co uk
| Retrocomputing: a PC card in a Risc PC
BNFL: Buy No Fish Locally