On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:36:25PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, Sven Luther wrote: > > It would be nice to have the opinion of the ftp-masters on this, if this seems > > credible, and if there are design issues with it. > > A checklist of what NEW processing actually entails would be great too. See http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/sponsorship_checklist.html for my personal criteria for sponsorship, which isn't quite NEW processing, but I presume solves a similar problem. Additions welcome. > aren't gratuitiously many (a -doc package for 10 kbytes of > documentation...) (what's the current opinion on that, anyway?) I think it's pretty much like pornography. "I know it when I see it". 10kB is probably too small, but I don't think there's a hard-and-fast cutoff. - Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature