Re: about Nybbles : how to keep all those archs releasable complying with the Vancouver Project
luna <luna@bzh.net> wrote:
> | * To: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org
> | * Subject: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
> | * From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
> | * Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:45:09 -0800
>
> We all have seen this proposal for "dropping architecture" and a lot
> of us are crying because their favourite pet architecture will be
> dropped.
Wrong. My favourite arch is i386, and still I dislike very much the
original plan.
> I think, that quite all the eleven archs released with Sarge can
> comply the steps in order to be releasable with etch.
The plan only works (i.e. leads to a smoother release process and
prevents burnout in core teams) *if* there are less architectures in
etch.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: