[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: about Nybbles : how to keep all those archs releasable complying with the Vancouver Project

luna <luna@bzh.net> wrote:

> |    * To: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org
> |    * Subject: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
> |    * From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
> |    * Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:45:09 -0800
> We all have seen this proposal for "dropping architecture" and a lot
> of us are crying because their favourite pet architecture will be
> dropped.

Wrong.  My favourite arch is i386, and still I dislike very much the
original plan.

> I think, that quite all the eleven archs released with Sarge can
> comply the steps in order to be releasable with etch.

The plan only works (i.e. leads to a smoother release process and
prevents burnout in core teams) *if* there are less architectures in

Regards, Frank
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Reply to: