Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...)

[Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2005.bluespice.org>]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:20:34AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:

> If we are going to require redundancy, I think we should do it better
> and add:
> - at least two buildd administrators

*nod*

> - systems located in at least two different facilities (different
>   cities and backbones if at all possible)
> This allows the buildd administrator to take vacations, etc.
> This allows for redundancy in case of fire, flood, earthquake etc.

For example both public debian m68k machines are located on the same window
sill at the Univ. of Duesseldorf. IMHO not the best place to position
important infrastructure.

-- 
Ciao...              // 
      Ingo         \X/