[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Call for help / release criteria (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

On Monday 14 March 2005 17:31, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
> Frank Küster a écrit :
> > - First of all, we should take the details as a starting point for
> >   discussion, not as a decision that has made.  Nevertheless, we must
> >   take into account that there are reasons for it: The people doing the
> >   release, ftpmaster, etc. work noticed that they cannot go on like
> >   before.
> Why they don't ask for help?

They do so now. Are you (all) prepared to take up the call?

While the slower arches are not able to fulfil quality requirements for a top 
notch stable release with security support and everything, they surely should 
be able to provide their binaries as available in tier-2.

I also have faith, that the security team will run security updates through 
tier-2 buildds but without delaying the DSAs for tier-1 arches and without 
having to do overnighters or something if a build fails on a tier-2 arch.

Regards, David
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;)
 -- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15

Reply to: