Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Hi, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op ma, 14-03-2005 te 12:38 +0100, schreef David Schmitt:
>> On Monday 14 March 2005 11:28, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> > In this case, it was a bug that required human intervention, a package
>> > upload that accidentally would hose a chroot, which required the
>> > chroot to be repaired for each affected buildd.
>>
>> Even that can be mitigated by debootstrapping the chroot once a day
>> automatically.
>
... which can break too.
> Not really. You are severely underestimating the time it takes to do
> that on the slower architectures.
It can, however, be mitigated by LVM snapshotting.
Or even just plain old rsync'ing.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Reply to: