Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:33:16 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050314123316.GA5300@hattusa.textio>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050314120022.GF850@cloud.net.au>
References: <20050314044505.GA5157@mauritius.dodds.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0503140721080.4772@wr-linux02> <[🔎] 20050314091032.GD6416@2004.bluespice.org> <[🔎] 20050314120022.GF850@cloud.net.au>

Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:10:32AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > All the work and support over all those years by all those users and porters
> > will be vanished with that stupid idea, imho. 
> 
> Ingo, obviously you are pissed off. But really, is there much benefit in
> making *releases* for the SCC architectures? 

For anyone who uses Debian as base of a commercial solution it is a
requirement. Grabing some random unstable snapshot is a non-starter.


Thiemo

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>

References:
- Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
  - From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2005.bluespice.org>
- Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Next by Date: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Previous by thread: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Next by thread: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread