[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:41:18PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> On Monday 14 March 2005 11:10, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > pcc is barely at 98%. I don't think that barrier should be that high. We
> > *should* at last release with the tree most important archs: i386, amd64,
> > powerpc.
> Please, 98% is not high. It is just a call to porters to get their act 
> together.
> I don't believe that any (sane) maintainer would refuse FTBFS fixing patches 
> (see hurd-i386 and k{net,free}-bsd stuff). These criterions are just a IMHO 
> necessary step to put the load on those people who want to use the arch 
> instead of those who maintain central infrastructure.

Like the arm autobuilders for example ? Mmm, but then the arm buildd
maintainer is also our main ftp-master, right ? 


Sven luther

Reply to: