Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

[David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at>]

On Monday 14 March 2005 11:10, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> pcc is barely at 98%. I don't think that barrier should be that high. We
> *should* at last release with the tree most important archs: i386, amd64,
> powerpc.

Please, 98% is not high. It is just a call to porters to get their act 
together.

I don't believe that any (sane) maintainer would refuse FTBFS fixing patches 
(see hurd-i386 and k{net,free}-bsd stuff). These criterions are just a IMHO 
necessary step to put the load on those people who want to use the arch 
instead of those who maintain central infrastructure.


Regards, David

-- 
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;)
 -- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15