[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 08:45:09PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:

> Therefore, we're planning on not releasing most of the minor architectures
> starting with etch.

> Architectures that are no longer being considered for stable
> releases are not going to be left out in the cold.  The SCC
> infrastructure is intended as a long-term option for these other
> architectures, and the ftpmasters also intend to provide porter
> teams with the option of releasing periodic (or not-so-periodic)
> per-architecture snapshots of unstable.

Why don't we give non-release architectures a per-arch testing?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: