[Blunt Jackson] > I am familiar with the nss issue, although that's not really relevant > to this question. The nss issue, and the related question in the FAQ > is that when statically linking to libc, there are still dynamic > loads required -- but libc handles this for the application. > (Presumably by dlopen.) Yes, dlopen, but the problem is version skew. With a dynamic libc6, libc and the NSS modules will always be compatible. With a static libc6, NSS functions (gethostbyname, getpwuid, etc.) will only work if the target system has a very similar version of libc to the one the app was linked with. Or they'll be ABI-incompatible and your program will crash. Kind of defeats the purpose of static linking. I know this is not directly related your question, but you displayed what seemed to be a misunderstanding of the static + NSS problem, so.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature