Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)
From: Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:03:50 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050305170350.GA12677@ngolde.de>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87sm3arr8c.fsf_-_@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
References: <42274908.1050803@azure.humbug.org.au> <20050303175839.GA18888@pegasos> <42280F57.9020601@azure.humbug.org.au> <20050304081711.GA28059@pegasos> <20050304081711.GA28059@pegasos> <422846B6.40509@azure.humbug.org.au> <E1D7Bir-0007tg-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <4228C29D.80208@azure.humbug.org.au> <20050305125010.GA11204@cloud.net.au> <[🔎] 87sm3arr8c.fsf_-_@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>

HI,
* Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> [2005-03-05 17:52]:

Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> wrote:
There's rumours on debian-devel that NEW processing is actual on hold(by decision rather than by default) but that wasn't communicated. Ofcourse it may be false
It is false.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2005/03/msg00019.html


But it is very slow at the moment.
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - 310777820@ICQ | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF

http://www.ngolde.de | mutt-ng.berlios.de | grml.orgVIM has two modes - the one in which it beepsand the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred

Attachment: pgpQLARwTP0Zb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)
  - From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>

References:
- Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo
Next by Date: Re: fftw3 non-pic k7 optimisations
Previous by thread: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)
Next by thread: Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread