[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: procmail and Large File Support



On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 12:59:49PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:

> > > The version in experimental has -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, and it works
> > > on files larger than 2GB, but I have only tested it on the i386
> > > architecture.

> > Please use the value of $(getconf LFS_CFLAGS) instead; it appears (based on
> > past exim4 bug reports) that using -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 on natively 64-bit
> > systems such as alpha causes surprising breakage of some glibc APIs.

> Ok, will do that.

> > > * Would the release managers approve this change for sarge?
> > 
> > If this is the only change, yes.

> Hmm, while we are at it, I think it would be good to fix #295604 as well.
> This is the (trivial) patch:

> diff -ru procmail-3.22.orig/src/header.h procmail-3.22/src/header.h
> --- procmail-3.22.orig/src/header.h     1999-07-06 08:12:22.000000000 +0200
> +++ procmail-3.22/src/header.h  2005-02-17 00:34:47.000000000 +0100
> @@ -168,3 +168,5 @@
>  X(readreceiptto,       "Read-Receipt-To:")       /* miscellaneous extension */
>  X(fakesender,          "Fake-Sender:")
>  X(envelopeto,          "Envelope-To:")                    /* exim extension */
> +X(useragent,           "User-Agent:")
> +X(nntppostingdate,     "NNTP-Posting-Date:")

Looks straightforward, yes.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: