Hi Adam, > I'd prefer it if there were *no* official kernel-image-xen packages. > The reason, is that it's an increased load on the security team. > Plus, maintaining the config. this repo is *not* official ;) It's there for everybody like me who are interesed in Xen and like to evaluate it. This repo will save a lot of CUP cycles... The current approach with the version number 2.6.10-4+xen.1 lead to an update to a security fixed version -5 without Xen. This is the big advantage of the versioning scheme. The disadvantage is the lossing support for Xen. But for me it's important to have a security fixed kernel then a feature overloaded ;) Sorry, but the previous link uses the intranet addersses :( Here are the right one: deb http://einstein.speech-design.de/~br/kernel-image-xen ./ deb-src http://einstein.speech-design.de/~br/kernel-image-xen ./ -- Raphael
Attachment:
pgpNBLuwbghI7.pgp
Description: PGP signature