[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: copyright vs. license

Thomas writes:
> It should be every year that the work was published.  (If you publish in
> year N, then modify and publish the new thing in year M, you should list
> both years.)

> There is no harm in listing extra years.

There could be if you do so in a way that could be construed as an attempt
to fraudulently extend the life of the copyright.
John Hasler

Reply to: