Re: copyright vs. license
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: copyright vs. license
- From: Jens Peter Secher <jpsecher@get2net.dk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:49:48 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87k6qhgo4z.fsf@83.73.128.1.ip.tele2adsl.dk>
- In-reply-to: <3mgE2-6JB-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (Thomas Bushnell's message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:10:10 +0100")
- References: <3lV6F-4Ye-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <3lZN0-RN-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <3m4jz-4x8-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <3mdPL-4h4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <3mgE2-6JB-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
> Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> writes:
>
>> It's not required. And I get bored by updating them.
>
> Yes, the year is required, and moreover, you need to add a new year
> every time there is a new publication in a year not already mentioned
> (without removing the old years, since the new publication is a
> derived work).
And remember that you need to brush your teeth before you go to bed.
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher get2net dk_
Reply to: