Re: Debianized ndiswrapper-source is better on SourceForge

[Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>]

#include <hallo.h>
* William Ballard [Mon, Jan 10 2005, 12:40:12PM]:

> The only thing it "has to have" module-assistant is a couple of 
> variables in debian/rules.  For that trivial advantage we now have tight 
> coupling on the rest of module-assistant, which means if those variables 
> change in module-assistant every other package has to change as well.

WTF? IIRC there are studies about where low cooupling and high cohesion
make sense and where not.

> Loose coupling is better than tight coupling.

ROTFL

Dude, what did you read in the software engineering classes? Comic books?
Please visit a Software Product Lines courses before spreading more crap
(and maybe something about databases to learn the meaning of ACID).

In the meantime, begin to recompile Debian with staticaly linked
packages. That is very important, you know. That evil libc causes such a
mess of tight coupling, one could become crazy from just imaging all the
possible consequences!!!!!!!1

Regards,
Eduard.
-- 
Russian roulette for linux:
[ $[ $RANDOM % 6 ] == 0 ] && rm -rf / || echo "Still breathing, eh?"