[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: MPEG in general Was: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?



On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:56:43PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 12:06:53PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > > Is only MPEG Layer III patent encumbered ?
> > > > How about the other MPEG stuff ?
> > > > I find it hard to believe that it is all patent-free.
> > > 
> > > It's all encumbered with patents.  Encoders *and* decoders.
> > 
> > Encoders only, not decoders. Decoders for anything probably cannot be
> > patented.
> 
> Really? AFAIR every producent of mobile mp3 player had to pay patent
> grants, to be able to distribute his device.

They'll only sell you licenses to the encoder patents if you pay them
for your decoders as well. That's not the same thing.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: