Re: New stable version after Sarge
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:35:37PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Andrew Pollock <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > That said, this (rather large) blocker shouldn't be the issue it has
> > been for this release for the next one. The two biggest blockers to
> > releasing any time soon have been the installer and the security
> > infrastructure. I'm actually not abreast of what the issue is with
> > the security infrastructure, so I don't know if it's likely to be a
> > blocker all over again come etch release time. I'd like to think
> > it's going to easier to release etch sooner.
> It shouldn't be forgotten that the biggest blocker after these things
> is probably a general failure to actually care all that much. How many
> people are actually behaving as if a release is just around the
> corner? How can we fix this?
We've spent most of the past year thinking a release might be just round
the corner. We can only cry wolf so many times before the world stops
believing us and finds an option that actually works.
She's the one for me. She's all I really need, oh yeah.
Bring some pragmatism back to Debian - mjg59 for DPL!