[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GtkMozEmbed with Firefox not Mozilla



* William Ballard (nospam_40811@alltel.net) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:55:42PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > And what would the advantage be over using mozilla? The gecko engine
> > is the same, in fact mozilla tends to have a newer gecko engine than
> > firefox. I mean this could be done, but if it doesn't actually confer
> > any advantages why bother? And I can't think of any. 
> 
> Why should I install an email client and web page editor,
> the bloat that is Mozilla, just to get GtkMozEmbed?

Err, the email client and webpage editor are separate packages, so you
don't need them if you're worried about bloat. If you're really
worried about bloat, you should ask the mozilla maintainers to
separate out the needed libraries in a separate package for you.
 
> "Why" is the exact same reasons as wanting Firefox not Mozilla
> in the first place.

-- 
Eric Dorland <eric.dorland@mail.mcgill.ca>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C  2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ 
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ 
G e h! r- y+ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: