Hi John!
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:09:16PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> > I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
> > I'd like to veto here.
>
> They did no such thing. As the previous maintainer, I set the
> maintainer to Debian QA, which is the *right and proper thing to do*
> until the new person actually makes an opload.
>
And QA-Team did so.
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/08/msg00048.html
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2004/08/msg00011.html
> >
> > A ready package, that solve this bug is already available.
> > Why did QA-group adopt this package instead to sponsor my upload?
>
> Did you even read the changelog at all?
>
> gif2png (2.4.7-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Orphaning this package.
>
> -- John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:03:42 -0500
>
> See, *I* orphaned it. That is the latest release. Nobody on the QA
> team has done a thing with the package.
>
I think you missed the new QA-Upload of gif2png 2.4.7-3.
Please see:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gif2png.html
and:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gif2png/news/1.html
"Changes:
gif2png (2.4.7-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Adopting this package."
> > What are next steps?
> > Could QA-team revert their package and sponsor my one or have I build
> > a new one?
>
> What QA package?
>
gif2png 2.4.7-3
Ok, I will build a new package these days and ask again for
sponsoring.
Regards,
Erik
--
www.ErikSchanze.de *********************************************
Bitte keine HTML-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Maillimit: 1 MB *
* Linux-Info-Tag in Dresden, am 30. Oktober 2004 *
Info: http://www.linux-info-tag.de *
Attachment:
pgpwj6y9wDWv3.pgp
Description: signature