[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: testing and no release schedule



On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 08:52:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 11:38:39AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 10:19:36PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:34:11PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > Every package on http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical is a candidate
> > > > for removal. A list of such packages is posted to debian-devel-announce
> > > > regularly. I don't believe any of those packages are being removed within
> > > > a few weeks' of an RC bug being filed unless the maintainer specifically
> > > > asks otherwise; if that's not the case, it's probably a mistake and I'd
> > > > be interested to see any examples.
> > > 
> > > Today, update_excuses says
> > > 
> > >      * -sleuthkit (1.61-4 to -)
> > >           + Removal request by cjwatson
> > >           + Package is broken, will try to remove
> > > 
> > > I see exactly 0 open RC bugs against sleuthkit.
> > 
> >   http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/debian-release-200403/msg00019.html
[...]
> > BTW, the name of the person filing the removal request is there so that
> > you can ask them about it if you disagree.
> 
> All I did was to answer ajt's request who wanted to see an example for a
> package that gets removed from testing without any open (and weekly
> posted) RC bugs...

The RC bugs were there at the time the removal was requested, though, so
this is not an example of what ajt mentioned as a possible mistake.

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: