Re: The GnuStep genericly-named package virus grows worse
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 02:00:37PM -0800, William Ballard wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:40:33PM -0500, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > Fine, if you want to play it that way. Let's try 'ftp' then.
>
> Can we revert some Governing body to resolve disputes like this, such
> as "if it's mentioned significantly in a Posix spec, it is assumed to be
> in the Posix namespace, and the Posix namespace is the only such
> recognized namespace?"
Let's call it the "whining-about-pim resolution committee".
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: