Re: udev device naming policy concerns
sean finney <seanius@seanius.net> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 11:11:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> writes:
>>
>> > Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
>> > > So I'm all for sticking with maintaining devfs names.
>> >
>> > And I'm all against it. (Whee!)
>>
>> Thats makes 1:1. Lets get more people to get a quorum.
>
> okay, fwiw, i'm against devfs names in as much as i don't think they are
> what should be used by default. if there's a low or medium priority
> debconf question that gives the option between one and/or the other,
> all the better, but at least by default let's do things like the rest
> of the linux/unix world please :)
Many/most commercial Unixen have had devfs-like systems for years ;-).
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
Reply to: