On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 11:11:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> writes: > > > Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes: > > > So I'm all for sticking with maintaining devfs names. > > > > And I'm all against it. (Whee!) > > Thats makes 1:1. Lets get more people to get a quorum. okay, fwiw, i'm against devfs names in as much as i don't think they are what should be used by default. if there's a low or medium priority debconf question that gives the option between one and/or the other, all the better, but at least by default let's do things like the rest of the linux/unix world please :) sean
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature