Split packages providing services (Re: Release update)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Split packages providing services (Re: Release update)
- From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:10:14 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040401191037.2142.qmail@33cb6e2e6a5ba8.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20040330140854.GB4619@fysh.org>
- References: <20040329144022.GA24540@riva.ucam.org> <20040329152459.GA27437@steve.org.uk> <20040329175005.GC17981@keid.carnet.hr> <20040329180159.GA1809@steve.org.uk> <20040329201358.GB4937@keid.carnet.hr> <20040329212351.GB10196@steve.org.uk> <20040329212825.GA17217@keid.carnet.hr> <1080654190.3518.32.camel@minas-tirith.u-bordeaux3.fr> <20040330140854.GB4619@fysh.org>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 03:08:54PM +0100, Zefram wrote:
> Therefore, I suggest that we separate each of these daemon packages into
> two, one that provides the daemon software and a separate one to run it.
> That way those of us who want to install a daemon and use it in our own
> way would not be hampered by someone's idea of how the daemon should
> normally be run. And where the daemon is packaged with a client,
> installing the client wouldn't cause an unwanted daemon to run.
I agree. Having the programs and the service split into two packages
has another advantage, see this thread; it also points to few packages
already doing what you suggest
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/52773
Regards, Gerrit.
Reply to: