Re: testing and no release schedule
Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> wrote:
[...]
> I'm not suggesting dropping support. Please learn to read. I'm saying that
> architectures with RC bugs that are not popular should not hold up the
> release. They can be released later. It will be up to the individual arch
> teams when the release happens.
You are aware that we do not have any infrastructure for a delayed
release of some archs or know how to do it?
What happens if foo is buggy on arm at time X when i386 releases? You
change the source and put it into the next point-release of i386?
You'd have to freeze the autobuilders to upgrading to sid. You'd have
to make the testing scripts smarter.
cu andreas
--
NMUs aren't an insult, they're not an attack, and they're
not something to avoid or be ashamed of.
Anthony Towns in 2004-02 on debian-devel
Reply to: