David B Harris wrote: > Got a better suggestion then? With Ean's mail to -devel, it's pretty > apparent that these two can't work it out amongst themselves. I would > think that a group of people doing what the tech-ctte is supposed to be > doing would be the ideal people to hear both sides and make an (enforced) > decision on the matter. > > Maybe the tech-ctte needs to be "upgraded" before it deals with this > particular case? Why do you want to broaden the scope of the technical committee? Are you not happy with our constitutionally elected DPL? -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature