Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 02:41, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >seems OpenOffice.org has similar restrictions on their logo
> >(http://www.openoffice.org/about_us/summary.html), how were they
> >handled?
> These look worse, actually. I don't see any permission to use any of those
> logos in the Debian context at all.
>
> However, the icons shipped in the tarball are presumably covered by the same
> license as the rest of the software. I hope. I suppose someone should
> clarify that. :-/
This is the first I have seen of the logos and licences on that page. I
think our packages predate that page. We have always used the logos
straight out of OOo CVS, which is completely dual licensed LGPL/SISSL.
Chris
OOo packager
Reply to: