Re: Debian Debconf Translation proposal ( again )

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian Debconf Translation proposal ( again )
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:56:06 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040107105605.GA3658@mykerinos>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040107095222.GH12258@riva.ucam.org>
References: <[🔎] 87k744rclu.fsf@student.kuleuven.ac.be> <[🔎] 20040106230119.GF12258@riva.ucam.org> <[🔎] 20040107004006.GA25263@grep.be> <[🔎] 20040107095222.GH12258@riva.ucam.org>

Quoting Colin Watson (cjwatson@debian.org):

> isn't correct. If the maintainer isn't responding quickly enough for
> you, the NMU mechanism is available.

And used...-)

Reply to:

References:
- Debian Debconf Translation proposal ( again )
  - From: Dominique Devriese <dominique.devriese@student.kuleuven.ac.be>
- Re: Debian Debconf Translation proposal ( again )
  - From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Re: Debian Debconf Translation proposal ( again )
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
- Re: Debian Debconf Translation proposal ( again )
  - From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#224828: Split config file is worrying...
Next by Date: Managing changes to configure.in as patches
Previous by thread: Re: Debian Debconf Translation proposal ( again )
Next by thread: Re: Debian Debconf Translation proposal ( again )
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread