Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU of tetex-base 2.0.2c-2.1
Op vr, 10-12-2004 te 13:49 +0100, schreef Frank Küster:
> I must admit that I didn't know that failed *removals* of
> build-dependencies would cause the buildd to fail. Nobody cared to
> indicate that to us.
It can happen. It doesn't happen always, but sometimes it does. In
extreme cases, a buildd host can become so FUBARed that no package will
build anymore (because *every* dpkg run will fail).
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Reply to: