[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Linux Core Consortium

Michael K. Edwards wrote:

Fixing ABI forks, and articulating best known practices about managing
ABI evolution going forward, that's a good idea.  Building an open
source test kit that exercises the shared ABIs, validating that the
test kit builds substantially the same on each distro, and helping
ISVs resolve issues that the test kit missed (and add them as new test
cases), that's even better.  But if two competent packagers, working
on different distros, can't get the same ABI out of the same source
code, then upstream's build procedures are badly broken -- and I don't
want that papered over by passing binaries around!

If we could all share the same source packages and a tool set with the same calling conventions, we'd be very far in the direction of what LCC wishes to achieve. The fact is that Debian would have to stop there for most of its architectures, simply because most of our architectures are not in common with the rest of LCC.

I think it would be great to get this far. At that point we could decide if there is any purpose in using the same compile as other folks.



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply to: