[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:32:14 +0000, Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk> said: 

> On Monday 06 Dec 2004 10:01, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> The difference being that editing is a choice made by the person
>> doing the work, while censorship is a choice made by an otherwise
>> unrelated person in the same organisation.
>> Editing would be if the maintainer decided to remove the
>> package. Censorship is when some other developer tries to force
>> him.

> I don't think this holds. Censoring is editing for ideological
> reasons, which is a subset of editing. It has nothing to do with who
> does it. A censor is a third party, and editor is a third party, at
> least in literary terms.

	Is removing legal material to protect the viewer from material
 that is deemed ideologically inappropriate by some considered "
 editing for ideological reasons"?

Like all women, she believed that rest and pleasure were bad for
men. Fritz Leiber, _Swords and Ice Magic_
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: