Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 19:36:13 -0800, Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> said:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Maybe we should have such a process; maybe not. But regardless,
>> the current process allows each individual developer that judgment.
>>
>>
> All Debian process is a result of having a problem, and not having a
> process. The problem in this case is that a lot of people think they
> know what's right, but have not walked through all of the
> implications and distilled it to process, and aren't interested in
> doing that work.
I amnot sure setting up a process to censor packages is
something the project should be interested in doing, no.
manoj
--
Argue for your limitations, and sure enough, they're yours. Messiah's
Handbook : Reminders for the Advanced Soul
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: